2012 Presidential Campaign

Will Mitt Romney’s $10,000 bet lose him the Republican presidential nomination?

It’s fair to say that all the Republican presidential candidates are pretty wealthy. But Mitt Romney possibly made a big mistake in Saturday night’s debate by offering to make a $10,000 bet with Rick Perry. While Perry turned down the bet, Romney’s opponents seized on Romney’s offer as a sign of his lack of understanding of the hardships facing most Americans.

Romney has been the frontrunner in the Republican campaign for most of the year, despite apparent misgivings on the part of many within the party. His $10,000 offer, however, might turn out to be his first really big mis-step in the campaign, and will doubtless be seized upon by his rivals in the run up to the Iowa caucus. The $10,000 bet could cost Romney votes at a time when he can ill afford to lose ground.

Romney’s main rival, Newt Gingrich, had a reasonably assured evening. He (mostly) batted away sustained attacks from his rivals, and had a good answer for Romney’s attack on him for being a ‘career politician’. This was a more assured performance from Gingrich than many expected, and should cement his current lead over Romney. Recent polls put him as much as 13 percentage points ahead of the rest of the pack, something that would have seemed impossible just a couple of months ago when Gingrich looked to be down and out in this campaign.

The other candidates had a fairly quiet night. Ron Paul, currently more or less equal second with Romney in the polls, landed a few blows on Gingrich but mostly failed to be heard on a range of issues. Michele Bachmann was mostly invisible, Rick Santorum was barely there, and Jon Huntsman had the courtesy to be elsewhere on a night when he likely would have been almost ignored anyway. This is looking like a battle between Romney and Gingrich now, with Paul as a dark horse who could yet cause an upset.

Discussion

One thought on “Will Mitt Romney’s $10,000 bet lose him the Republican presidential nomination?

  1. People see and hear what they want to see and hear.

    To me it was even more telling that Perry “Did Not” take the bet.
    It’s up to him to prove his assertions with specificity and detail.
    Whether Mitt made a bet or not is not the point.
    Once again, the anti-Romney’s are playing the game of “transference”.
    The old Strawman.

    The ever “frugal” Romney is so sure Perry is lying, that he is willing to put hard cold cash on it.
    That is now detrimental to Mitt?
    Only in twisted partisan minds.

    The question still remains……. “Perry, where is the proof to your assertions.”
    Perry made the accusations, it’s incumbent upon him to put forth the evidence.

    And where is the media in holding Perry accountable?

    Posted by Bucky | December 11, 2011, 1:52 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: