End of the road for the Obscene Publications Act?

Since 1857, delicate British sensibilities have been protected by the Obscene Publications Act, which outlaws anything that is intended to ‘deprave or corrupt’. But the act, which has in the past been used against the likes of Lady Chatterley’s Lover and the magazine Oz, looks to be in tatters this week after a London jury rejected some of its core tenets.

In the case of a man accused of running a mail-order business, the jury ruled that the material – which depicted legal, consensual acts between men – could not be ruled to have run afoul of the act. Experts now say that the Obscene Publications Act is virtually impossible to use and that it needs to be overhauled if it is to remain relevant.

The act has been used more than 70 times in the past year and is unofficially used by many licensing agencies working in the media. As David Allen Green wrote during the case, current law regarding obscenity simply doesn’t make sense in the modern digital age.


About Michael R. Gideon

Writer, teacher, dog walker, guitarist, husband, father, reader, journalist etc. I mainly write at 100gf | Politics and Computers, but occasionally at other sites such as TV Vomit and Indie Bookspot. My Google Plus profile.


No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: